The study is underway; decisions will be made by 2027. Make your voice heard now. Sign the petition →
The Washington Crossing Bridge today: historic 1905 iron truss, one lane each way, trucks banned
TODAY
The Washington Crossing Bridge, Today
Historic iron truss, built 1905. One lane each way. Trucks banned. 15 mph.
VS
What the DRJTBC replacement would bring: a wide multi-lane crossing with semi-trucks, black exhaust, and pollution
THE DRJTBC'S PLAN
What They Want to Turn It Into
Wider lanes. No weight limit. Trucks. Exhaust. Through your neighborhood.

They Want to Build a Road Nearly 3× Wider Through the Heart of Washington Crossing

The Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission wants to build a replacement bridge with 12-foot lanes, full shoulders, and no weight restrictions.

This will bring more noise, more pollution, longer commute times, and could impact the value of your home. Say no to the DRJTBC's plan. Say no to destroying Washington Crossing.

The Numbers Don't Lie. See What the DRJTBC Is Studying

TODAY'S BRIDGE
Total road width 15 feet
Lane width 7.5 ft each
Weight limit 3 tons (trucks banned)
Speed limit 15 mph
Walking path 3.5 ft
Trucks through village NONE
DRJTBC
PROPOSAL
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT
Total road width ~44 feet
Lane width 12 ft each (modern std.)
Weight limit NONE - all vehicles
Speed limit Standard road speeds
Walking path 10 ft
Trucks through village UNRESTRICTED
wider than the existing bridge, built to full modern highway standards, with zero weight restrictions.
Sources: DRJTBC public scoping materials, washingtoncrossingbridge.com

What a Wider Bridge Actually Does to Your Community

The bridge isn't just infrastructure. It's the gateway to everything that makes Washington Crossing worth protecting. Make it 3× wider and everything changes.

🚛

Trucks Invade the Village

The current 3-ton weight limit is what keeps 18-wheelers, cement mixers, and heavy commercial vehicles out of Washington Crossing. A modern replacement bridge has no weight limit. From day one, trucks would roar through streets lined with historic buildings that sit on dirt foundations that cannot withstand the vibrations.

📈

Traffic Volumes Explode

Today's bridge carries about 7,200 crossings a day, controlled by its narrow lanes and 15 mph limit. A full-width modern crossing removes every friction point. Regional through-traffic that now avoids this route would flood in. The road into Washington Crossing is not designed for this. Neither is the village.

💨

Pollution and Noise, Daily

More traffic means exhaust, diesel particulates, and road noise, constantly. The historic park, the Delaware Canal towpath, and the riverfront walking paths become less a sanctuary and more a highway shoulder. What families come here to escape would follow them home.

🏛️

Irreversible Damage to 250-Year-Old Buildings

Washington Crossing's historic structures, some dating to the era of George Washington's 1776 crossing, have dirt and rubble foundations. Expert testimony confirms they cannot withstand the vibrations of heavy truck traffic. Once damaged, these buildings cannot be restored to what they were.

🛤️

The Road Doesn't Stop at the Bridge

A wider bridge needs wider approach roads. The DRJTBC is studying multiple alignment options, including routes that would cut through currently intact parts of the historic village. Whatever road network is needed to feed a modern crossing will reshape the entire neighborhood, not just the river crossing.

🦺

Construction Would Last Years

Building a replacement bridge means years of pile driving, concrete pours, lane closures, detour traffic, and construction equipment pounding through the community, all immediately adjacent to Washington Crossing Historic Park, the Delaware Canal, and the village's historic core.

Two and a Half Centuries of History: at Risk

Washington Crossing is not just a postcard; it is the site of one of the most consequential moments in American history. On Christmas night 1776, General George Washington crossed the Delaware River here to attack the Hessians at Trenton. The outcome changed the course of the Revolutionary War.

The bridge that exists today was built in 1904-1905, but the piers and embankments it rests on date to the 1830s. A historic district study confirmed the bridge and surrounding village are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The double Warren truss structure represents, in the words of an architectural historian, "the golden age of metal truss bridge construction."

Upper Makefield Township has hired a preservation consultant and is actively pursuing National Register designation, a move that could provide legal protection against demolition.

1776

Washington crosses the Delaware at this exact location, changing the Revolutionary War

1830s

Original piers and embankments built, still supporting the bridge today

1905

The current iron truss bridge opens, built for the automobile age's dawn

2024–2027

DRJTBC Alternatives Analysis underway; the decision window is now

National Register Eligible

"The Golden Age of Metal Truss Bridge Construction"

A Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission spokesperson has confirmed the bridge is eligible for National Register of Historic Places listing. An architectural historian described the 120-year-old double Warren truss as a masterpiece, one that cannot be replicated once demolished.

Upper Makefield Township has allocated funds and hired preservation consultant Jeffrey Marshall (former Heritage Conservancy president) to pursue historic district designation for the Taylorsville section of Washington Crossing, the village the new bridge would run through.

Washington Crossing Historic Park

A 500-acre state park that attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors a year. A massive modern highway crossing immediately adjacent to this park would scar its landscape, increase noise and traffic on its paths, and fundamentally undermine the historic atmosphere that makes it worth visiting.

Your Neighbors Are Already Speaking Out

"If they build to their standard, they're going to build a bridge that's bigger, heavier, and wider. There is not a good option... The best alternative is to not hurt our town."

Tom Cino
Supervisor, Upper Makefield Township

"If they have a real full bridge that is not terrifying to cross, the traffic will really be a disaster. We're all very concerned."

Courtney Peters-Manning
Mayor, Hopewell, New Jersey

"You get that first truck over the bridge and you're going to ruin the quaintness. I don't want anything to happen. I want it to stay as it is for eternity."

Rick Speranza
Vice President, Newtown Historic Association

"Historic village buildings have dirt foundations and cannot withstand vibrations from heavier traffic. A new bridge built to modern standards would be bigger, heavier, and wider; one option would open the door to heavy truck traffic."

Community testimony
Washington Crossing Bridge Public Scoping Session, 2026

There Are Smarter Options. We Demand They Be Studied Fairly

The study must include all alternatives with equal rigor. The Commission cannot use a deficiency checklist to justify the most destructive option while treating rehabilitation as a checkbox.

01

Full Structural Rehabilitation

Modern engineering can extend the life of the existing iron truss for decades. The 2025 inspection confirmed it is structurally sound for posted loads. Invest in targeted repair and reinforcement, without demolition, without a new wider road.

02

Redirect Traffic to Scudder Falls

The Scudder Falls Bridge, a full-capacity modern crossing - is 3 miles south. Wrightstown supervisors have formally stated it "can adequately handle cross-river traffic." Route heavier loads there. Leave Washington Crossing alone.

03

One-Way Signal-Controlled Operation

Convert to alternating one-way traffic controlled by signals. This improves flow and safety on the existing narrow span without widening, without demolition, and without opening the village to unrestricted traffic.

The Study Runs Through 2027. That's Your Window

The DRJTBC responds to sustained pressure. The public comment period closed in March 2026, but the study is not over, and your elected officials still have influence. Here's what to do:

1

Sign the Petition Below

Add your name and ZIP to show the Commission the breadth of opposition. We will deliver signatures directly to the Commission and to your state representatives.

2

Email the DRJTBC Directly

Write to info@drjtbc.org or call (609) 882-2000. Tell them you oppose any replacement that widens the crossing or removes weight restrictions.

3

Contact Your State Legislators

PA and NJ state legislators can apply direct political pressure on the Commission. Find your rep below and call their office; a phone call carries more weight than an email.

4

Share This Page Everywhere

Post on social media, neighborhood Facebook groups, and Nextdoor. Use the before/after comparison; it's the fastest way to make someone understand what's at stake.

5

Support Historic Designation

Contact Upper Makefield Township and support their National Register application. Historic designation is one of the strongest legal tools available to protect the site.

Sign the Petition

Demand the DRJTBC protect Washington Crossing; no replacement bridge that widens the crossing or removes weight restrictions.

Join 847 neighbors who have already signed

Contact the People Who Can Stop This

📧

DRJTBC Commission

The Commission controls the study. Write to oppose any replacement that widens the crossing or removes weight restrictions.

Email the Commission
🏘️

Upper Makefield Township

Already opposing replacement - support their historic designation efforts and their formal resolution.

Contact Township
🏛️

PA State Historic Preservation

Urge SHPO to expedite the National Register application for the bridge and Taylorsville district.

Contact SHPO
🏛️

PA State Legislators

Your PA House and Senate representatives can formally intervene. Call their offices - calls matter more than emails.

Find Your PA Rep
🏛️

NJ State Legislators

Hopewell and Mercer County residents - the NJ side has equal standing. Contact your Assembly and Senate members.

Find Your NJ Rep
📰

Local Media

Letters to the editor amplify the story. Write to the Bucks County Courier Times and Philadelphia Inquirer.

Send a Letter

Ready-to-Send Letter to the DRJTBC

Copy, personalize, and send to info@drjtbc.org

Dear Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, I am writing to formally oppose any replacement of the Washington Crossing Bridge with a wider structure built to modern highway standards. The current bridge, with its 15-foot roadway and 3-ton weight limit, serves a critically important protective function. It keeps heavy trucks, high-speed traffic, and unrestricted vehicle loads out of Washington Crossing, a historic village whose buildings date to the era of George Washington's 1776 crossing of the Delaware River. I understand the Commission is studying a replacement with 12-foot lanes, 4-to-6-foot shoulders, and a 10-foot walking path, a total roadway nearly 3 times wider than what exists today. This is not a bridge replacement. It is the introduction of a highway-capacity crossing into one of the most historically significant communities in America. My specific concerns are: • Unrestricted truck access will vibrate and damage historic buildings that sit on dirt foundations • Dramatically increased traffic volumes will overwhelm roads not designed for them • Construction will damage the Delaware Canal, the historic park, and the river environment • Multiple studied alignments could route approach roads directly through the historic village core • There is no restoring what is lost once this scale of infrastructure is built I urge the Commission to: 1. Pursue full structural rehabilitation of the existing bridge 2. Direct heavy regional traffic to the Scudder Falls Bridge, 3 miles south 3. Formally support Upper Makefield Township's National Register of Historic Places application This bridge and this village have endured for 120 and 250 years respectively. With leadership that matches their significance, they can endure for centuries more. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State, ZIP]

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes - based on the DRJTBC's own public scoping materials. The Commission is studying a replacement with 12-foot travel lanes (vs the current 7.5 feet), 4-to-6-foot shoulders, and a 10-foot walking path. That totals approximately 44 feet, compared to the current 15-foot roadway. That is nearly 3 times wider. Source: washingtoncrossingbridge.com FAQ and DRJTBC public scoping documents.
A modern bridge built to current highway standards would have no posted weight restriction - the 3-ton limit that currently keeps heavy trucks out would not apply. Community testimony at DRJTBC scoping sessions explicitly noted that "one option would open the door to heavy truck traffic." Historic buildings adjacent to the road approach have dirt foundations that experts say cannot withstand the vibrations from heavy vehicles.
No. The Alternatives Analysis is a NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) environmental review process running through approximately February 2027. No decision has been made. The Commission must formally evaluate "no action," rehabilitation, replacement, and repurposing. That process is ongoing, which is exactly why sustained community pressure matters right now.
The January 2025 structural inspection found the bridge is "capable of safely supporting the posted load." It is structurally sound for vehicles under 3 tons. The Commission calls it "functionally obsolete" because its pre-automobile design doesn't meet modern lane-width standards, but that is a different thing from "dangerous." And those very pre-automobile dimensions are what protect the village from modern traffic volumes.
The Scudder Falls Bridge, a modern, full-capacity crossing - is approximately 3 miles south of Washington Crossing. Wrightstown Township supervisors passed a formal resolution stating it "can adequately handle cross-river traffic" and should be used as an alternative to replacing the historic bridge. We agree: regional traffic belongs on a regional crossing, not running through a 250-year-old historic village.
National Register listing triggers mandatory Section 106 review under the National Historic Preservation Act for any federally assisted project, requiring the agency to study and mitigate harm. It doesn't automatically prevent demolition, but it creates significant legal, procedural, and political pressure. It also requires a much higher standard of public justification for any demolition decision.